Make vs Gumloop: best no-code automation for AI workflows (2026)

Last updated: 2026

Make logo

Make

Free plan available

Gumloop logo

Gumloop

Free plan available

Side-by-Side Comparison

MakeWinnerGumloop
Rating
Starting PriceFreeFree
Free Plan
Categoryai-automationai-automation
Top Features
  • Visual scenario builder with branching logic
  • 1,800+ app integrations (Google, Slack, Notion, CRMs, databases)
  • Native AI module: call OpenAI, Claude, Gemini as workflow steps
  • Scheduled and webhook-based triggers
  • Visual drag-and-drop workflow canvas
  • AI nodes: GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini built-in
  • Web scraper nodes with JavaScript rendering
  • PDF and document processing nodes
Try itTry Free →Try Free →

Our Verdict

🏆 Winner: Make

Make wins on breadth - 1,800+ app integrations, mature platform, large community, and proven reliability for complex business automations. Gumloop wins on AI-native simplicity - it is faster to get started with AI-specific workflows, and the visual canvas is more beginner-friendly for non-technical users who just want to chain AI steps together. If your main use case is connecting AI to 10+ business tools, Make is the stronger platform. If you want to quickly build AI pipelines without thinking about integrations, Gumloop is the faster path.

Make Pros & Cons

👍 Pros

  • Much more powerful than Zapier for complex logic
  • 1,800+ integrations covers virtually every tool
  • Free tier is genuinely functional
  • AI steps are first-class modules in any workflow
  • Much cheaper than Zapier for equivalent power

👎 Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than simpler tools
  • Operation-based pricing can get expensive at scale
  • No self-hosted option
  • Visual canvas can get cluttered with complex scenarios

Gumloop Pros & Cons

👍 Pros

  • Genuinely no-code - visual canvas is intuitive
  • AI-native: LLM steps are first-class nodes
  • Fast to build - most workflows done in under an hour
  • Free tier is functional for testing and small projects
  • Hosted: no infrastructure to manage

👎 Cons

  • Smaller node library than Make or n8n
  • Less mature than established automation tools
  • Credit-based pricing can add up for high-volume workflows
  • No self-hosted option (unlike n8n)

This page contains affiliate links. Learn more.