Make vs n8n: Which workflow automation tool is right for you? (2026)

Last updated: 2026

Make logo

Make

Free plan available

n8n logo

n8n

Free plan available

Side-by-Side Comparison

Maken8nWinner
Rating
Starting PriceFreeFree (self-hosted)
Free Plan
Categoryai-automationai-automation
Top Features
  • Visual scenario builder with branching logic
  • 1,800+ app integrations (Google, Slack, Notion, CRMs, databases)
  • Native AI module: call OpenAI, Claude, Gemini as workflow steps
  • Scheduled and webhook-based triggers
  • Visual workflow builder with 400+ nodes
  • Native AI Agent nodes - autonomous task execution
  • Supports OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Mistral as LLM backends
  • Self-hostable - full control, zero ongoing cost
Try itTry Free →Try Free →

Our Verdict

🏆 Winner: n8n

n8n wins if you are technical and want to self-host - you get unlimited workflows and executions for free, plus AI Agent nodes that can reason autonomously rather than following fixed steps. Make wins if you want a hosted solution with maximum app coverage (1,800+ integrations vs n8n's 400+) and a more polished UI that non-technical teammates can use. For solo builders and developers, n8n's self-hosted option is the best value in automation. For small teams who need wide integrations and don't want to manage infrastructure, Make's Core plan at $9/month is hard to beat.

Make Pros & Cons

👍 Pros

  • Much more powerful than Zapier for complex logic
  • 1,800+ integrations covers virtually every tool
  • Free tier is genuinely functional
  • AI steps are first-class modules in any workflow
  • Much cheaper than Zapier for equivalent power

👎 Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than simpler tools
  • Operation-based pricing can get expensive at scale
  • No self-hosted option
  • Visual canvas can get cluttered with complex scenarios

n8n Pros & Cons

👍 Pros

  • Self-hosted option is completely free with no usage limits
  • AI Agent nodes are genuinely autonomous - not just fixed step sequences
  • Code nodes let you handle any logic that lacks a dedicated integration
  • Strong and growing community
  • Open source - no vendor lock-in

👎 Cons

  • Self-hosting requires technical setup (Docker/VPS)
  • Cloud pricing is higher than Make for equivalent executions
  • Smaller integration library than Make (400 vs 1,800)
  • UI is less polished than Make or Zapier

This page contains affiliate links. Learn more.