Amazon Nova Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7
Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison
Quick take
- •Amazon Nova Pro is meaningfully stronger at speed (80 vs 68 on our capability index).
- •Claude Opus 4.7 is meaningfully stronger at coding (94 vs 68).
- •Amazon Nova Pro is 84% cheaper on input tokens, which compounds fast on high-volume or agentic workloads.
- •Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1M context window vs 300K tokens - better for whole-repo or long-document work.
Specs comparison
| Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon Web Services | Anthropic |
| Type | Closed source | Closed source |
| Context window | 300K tokens | ✓1M |
| Input / 1M tokens | ✓$0.80 | $5.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $3.20 | $25.00 |
| Release date | 2024-12 | 2026-04 |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | ~85% | - |
| SWE-bench Verified | - | 87.6% |
| SWE-bench Pro | - | 64.3% |
Scores sourced from official provider release posts and independent benchmark aggregators.
Which should you choose?
Choose Amazon Nova Pro if...
- →You are building on AWS and want native Bedrock integration
- →You need multimodal understanding of images or video plus text
- →You want a cost-balanced general model with a large context
- →You need enterprise controls: data residency, service tiers, prompt caching
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if...
- →You have a pipeline pinned to Opus 4.7 and need stability
- →Your workload is vision-heavy and benefits from higher-resolution image input
- →You need top-tier coding with 1M context but haven't migrated to 4.8 yet
- →You want documented, broadly available Opus-class behavior