Claude Opus 4.7 vs Command R+
Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison
Quick take
- •Claude Opus 4.7 is meaningfully stronger at multimodal (90 vs 5 on our capability index).
- •Command R+ is 50% cheaper on input tokens, which compounds fast on high-volume or agentic workloads.
- •Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1M context window vs 128K tokens - better for whole-repo or long-document work.
Specs comparison
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Command R+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Cohere |
| Type | Closed source | Closed source |
| Context window | ✓1M | 128K tokens |
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | ✓$2.50 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $10.00 |
| Release date | 2026-04 | 2024-08 |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | - |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | - |
| RAG (BEIR) | - | Top-5 |
| MMLU | - | ~75% |
Scores sourced from official provider release posts and independent benchmark aggregators.
Which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if...
- →You have a pipeline pinned to Opus 4.7 and need stability
- →Your workload is vision-heavy and benefits from higher-resolution image input
- →You need top-tier coding with 1M context but haven't migrated to 4.8 yet
- →You want documented, broadly available Opus-class behavior
Choose Command R+ if...
- →Your core use case is grounded RAG with citations
- →You need reliable multi-step tool/agent orchestration
- →You want an enterprise model available on Bedrock
- →You need multilingual responses across the 10 optimized languages