Claude Opus 4.7 vs Command R+
2026 - Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison
Quick take
- •Command R+ is 83% cheaper on input tokens - better for high-volume workloads.
- •Claude Opus 4.7 has a 200K context window - 2x larger than Command R+'s 128K. Better for long documents and large codebases.
Specs comparison
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Command R+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Cohere |
| Type | Closed source | Closed source |
| Context window | ✓200K | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | $15.00 | ✓$2.50 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $75.00 | $10.00 |
| Release date | 2025-09 | 2024-04 |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | ~75% | - |
| MMLU | ~90% | ~75% |
| HumanEval | ~95% | - |
| RAG (BEIR) | - | Top-5 |
Scores sourced from official provider release posts.
Strengths
Claude Opus 4.7
- ✓Best-in-class multi-step reasoning
- ✓Strong scientific and mathematical analysis
- ✓Superior long-context comprehension
- ✓Highly accurate instruction following
- ✓Best Anthropic model for research and analysis
Command R+
- ✓Purpose-built for RAG with citation grounding
- ✓Low hallucination rate on retrieval tasks
- ✓Reliable multi-step tool calling
- ✓Supports 10 business languages natively
- ✓Available for on-premise deployment
Which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need...
- →Complex research tasks
- →High-stakes code generation
- →Long-document analysis
- →Scientific reasoning
Choose Command R+ if you need...
- →Enterprise RAG applications
- →Knowledge base Q&A with citations
- →Multi-step agentic workflows
- →On-premise enterprise deployments