Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4
Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison
Quick take
- •GPT-5.4 is 50% cheaper on input tokens, which compounds fast on high-volume or agentic workloads.
- •Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1M context window vs 1,050,000 tokens (128,000 max output) - better for whole-repo or long-document work.
Specs comparison
| Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Type | Closed source | Closed source |
| Context window | ✓1M | 1,050,000 tokens (128,000 max output) |
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | ✓$2.50 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $15.00 |
| Release date | 2026-04 | 2026-03 |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | - |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | - |
Scores sourced from official provider release posts and independent benchmark aggregators.
Which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if...
- →You have a pipeline pinned to Opus 4.7 and need stability
- →Your workload is vision-heavy and benefits from higher-resolution image input
- →You need top-tier coding with 1M context but haven't migrated to 4.8 yet
- →You want documented, broadly available Opus-class behavior
Choose GPT-5.4 if...
- →Large-context tasks where GPT-5.5-level frontier reasoning is not required
- →Cost-conscious production workloads that still need strong capability
- →Migrating from GPT-5.4-based systems where behavior is already tuned