Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1
Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison
Quick take
- •Claude Opus 4.7 is meaningfully stronger at speed (68 vs 30 on our capability index).
- •Claude Opus 4.7 is 67% cheaper on input tokens, which compounds fast on high-volume or agentic workloads.
- •Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1M context window vs 200,000 tokens (100,000 max output) - better for whole-repo or long-document work.
Specs comparison
| Claude Opus 4.7 | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Type | Closed source | Closed source |
| Context window | ✓1M | 200,000 tokens (100,000 max output) |
| Input / 1M tokens | ✓$5.00 | $15.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $60.00 |
| Release date | 2026-04 | 2024-12 |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | - |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | - |
| AIME 2024 | - | 74% |
| GPQA Diamond | - | 77.3% |
| Codeforces | - | ~89th percentile |
Scores sourced from official provider release posts and independent benchmark aggregators.
Which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if...
- →You have a pipeline pinned to Opus 4.7 and need stability
- →Your workload is vision-heavy and benefits from higher-resolution image input
- →You need top-tier coding with 1M context but haven't migrated to 4.8 yet
- →You want documented, broadly available Opus-class behavior
Choose o1 if...
- →Hard, multi-step math, science, and logic problems that reward deliberate reasoning
- →Competitive programming and algorithmic problem solving
- →Existing o1-based pipelines already validated for reasoning tasks