Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1
2026 - Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison
Specs comparison
| Claude Opus 4.7 | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Type | Closed source | Closed source |
| Context window | 200K | 200K |
| Input / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $15.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $75.00 | $60.00 |
| Release date | 2025-09 | 2024-09 |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | ~75% | 78.3% |
| MMLU | ~90% | - |
| HumanEval | ~95% | 92.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified | - | 48.9% |
Scores sourced from official provider release posts.
Strengths
Claude Opus 4.7
- ✓Best-in-class multi-step reasoning
- ✓Strong scientific and mathematical analysis
- ✓Superior long-context comprehension
- ✓Highly accurate instruction following
- ✓Best Anthropic model for research and analysis
o1
- ✓Best-in-class math and physics
- ✓Strong competitive coding (Codeforces, HumanEval)
- ✓Scientific reasoning (GPQA top performer)
- ✓Multi-step logic and planning
- ✓200K context for long technical documents
Which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need...
- →Complex research tasks
- →High-stakes code generation
- →Long-document analysis
- →Scientific reasoning
Choose o1 if you need...
- →Math and science problems
- →Competitive programming
- →Complex multi-step reasoning
- →Research assistance