For Developers/Models/Compare/Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.5

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.5

Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison

Verdict

Two of the best price-performance frontier models of 2026: pick Claude Sonnet 5 for stronger agentic coding depth, pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for faster, cheaper output and stronger multimodal and tool-use benchmarks.

Specs comparison

Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.5
ProviderAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
TypeClosed sourceClosed source
Context window1M1,048,576 tokens (Gemini 3.5 Flash; Pro variant not yet released)
Input / 1M tokens$3.00$1.50
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$9.00
Release date2026-062026-05

Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.5
SWE-bench Verified~85.2%-
Terminal-Bench 2.180.4%-
SWE-bench Pro63.2%-
OSWorld-Verified81.2%-
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (coding)-76.2%
MCP Atlas (tool use)-83.6%
CharXiv Reasoning (multimodal)-84.2%

Scores sourced from official provider release posts and independent benchmark aggregators.

Capability and benchmarks

These land very close. Claude Sonnet 5 posts 80.4% Terminal-Bench 2.1, ~85.2% SWE-bench Verified, and 81.2% OSWorld-Verified for computer use. Gemini 3.5 Flash posts 76.2% Terminal-Bench 2.1, 83.6% MCP Atlas tool use, and 84.2% CharXiv multimodal reasoning. Sonnet 5 has the edge on pure coding and terminal agent depth (coding 92 vs 90); Gemini leads on multimodal (90 vs 85) and function-calling reliability. They lack a fully shared public coding number, so treat this as a genuine trade rather than a clean win.

Price, speed, and context

Both carry a ~1M-token context. On price, Gemini 3.5 Flash is $1.50/$9 per 1M versus Sonnet 5's $3/$15 standard ($2/$10 introductory through Aug 31, 2026). Gemini is also the speed leader, generating output roughly 4x faster than prior Pro models (capability speed 90 vs 82). One caveat on Sonnet 5: its new tokenizer emits ~30% more tokens for the same text, so effective cost can rise even though per-token rates look mid-tier.

Which to pick

  • Pick Sonnet 5 for agentic coding assistants, computer-use automation, and tasks where its self-checking and long-horizon completion matter.
  • Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for the cheapest, fastest option, heavy multimodal input (charts, documents, images), and agents that fire many tool calls.

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if...

  • You want frontier-adjacent agentic coding but need better cost-efficiency than Opus
  • You are running high-volume agent loops and want strong reasoning per dollar
  • You are already on Sonnet 4.6 and want a same-price capability upgrade
  • You need a 1M context window with fast latency
Full Claude Sonnet 5 details →

Choose Gemini 3.5 if...

  • You need frontier agent/coding performance without frontier prices
  • Building autonomous agents that make many tool calls
  • High-throughput production workloads that were previously too costly on a Pro model
  • You want a strong default multimodal model with a 1M-token context window
Full Gemini 3.5 details →

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 with others