For Developers/Models/Compare/Gemini 3.5 vs GPT-5.5

Gemini 3.5 vs GPT-5.5

2026 - Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison

Quick take

  • GPT-5.5 is open-weights - free to self-host with no API costs. Gemini 3.5 requires paid API access.
  • Gemini 3.5 has a 1M context window - 8x larger than GPT-5.5's 128K. Better for long documents and large codebases.

Specs comparison

Gemini 3.5GPT-5.5
ProviderGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
TypeClosed sourceClosed source
Context window1M128K
Input / 1M tokensTBAFree (self-host)
Output / 1M tokensTBAFree (self-host)
Release date2026-052026-04

Strengths

Gemini 3.5

  • Action-first architecture for agentic and multi-step workflows
  • 1M token context window - largest in class
  • Powers Google Antigravity CLI for terminal-native coding
  • Native Workspace integration with autonomous task execution
  • Companion Gemini Omni handles anything-to-anything multimodal generation

GPT-5.5

  • Improved instruction following over GPT-4o
  • Stronger long-context coherence
  • Better output consistency for agentic pipelines
  • GPT-5.5 Pro tier for reliability-critical workloads
  • Easier migration path than jumping from GPT-4o to GPT-5

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.5 if you need...

  • Agentic workflows requiring multi-step tool use
  • Large codebase comprehension and editing
  • Google Workspace automation
  • Long document and multimodal analysis
Full Gemini 3.5 details →

Choose GPT-5.5 if you need...

  • Production API integrations migrating from GPT-4o
  • Agentic workflows needing consistent structured output
  • Long-context document tasks
  • Teams deferring full GPT-5 migration costs
Full GPT-5.5 details →

Compare Gemini 3.5 with others