Gemma 3 vs GPT-5.5 Instant
Pricing, benchmarks, and use case comparison
Quick take
- •Gemma 3 is meaningfully stronger at cost efficiency (90 vs 70 on our capability index).
- •GPT-5.5 Instant is meaningfully stronger at coding (78 vs 62).
- •Gemma 3 is open-weights (free to self-host); GPT-5.5 Instant is paid API only.
- •GPT-5.5 Instant has a 1050000 context window vs 128K tokens (32K for the 1B variant) - better for whole-repo or long-document work.
Specs comparison
| Gemma 3 | GPT-5.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google DeepMind | OpenAI |
| Type | Open source | Closed source |
| Context window | 128K tokens (32K for the 1B variant) | ✓1050000 |
| Input / 1M tokens | ✓Free (self-host) | 5.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | Free (self-host) | 30.00 |
| Release date | 2025-03 | 2026-05 |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| MATH (27B) | 89% | - |
| MMMU (27B, multimodal) | 64.9% | - |
| AIME 2025 | - | 81.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | - | 82.7 |
| FrontierMath Tier 1–3 | - | 51.7 |
Scores sourced from official provider release posts and independent benchmark aggregators.
Which should you choose?
Choose Gemma 3 if...
- →You need an open, self-hostable model with a size to match your hardware
- →Multilingual or multimodal tasks on-prem
- →Privacy-sensitive or offline deployments
- →Fine-tuning on your own data
Choose GPT-5.5 Instant if...
- →Interactive chat and everyday assistant tasks where responsiveness matters most
- →High-volume, latency-sensitive workloads that do not need deep reasoning
- →General questions, drafting, and summarization at speed